wattaire
Anker
100W
CCA
736 Charger (Nano II 100W)
Anker · A2145
vs
Belkin
140W
CCCA
BoostCharge Pro 140W 4-Port GaN Wall Charger (PD 3.1)
Belkin · WCH014
The short version
Anker 736 Charger (Nano II 100W) is 35% smaller by volume.
With two devices plugged in, Belkin delivers 100 + 12 W against 60 + 40 W.
We know Anker better: 8.5/10 documentation against 7.5.
Size, true to scale
front and side, one scale
20
40
60
80
67×57×32 mm
120 cm³ · weight not published
96×76×25 mm
185 cm³ · weight not published

Solid block is the face you see in the socket; the outline next to it is depth.

Power by situation
bars share one scale · 142 W
One device, best port
100 W
140 W
What a laptop gets when nothing else is plugged in.
Two devices at once
60 + 40 W
100 + 12 W
The best published pair, which is rarely an even split.
Three devices at once
45 + 30 + 18 W
65 + 65 + 12 W
Everything plugged in together.

Port layouts differ, so we compare what you would do with the charger, not port pairs. Each row takes the best published combination for that situation.

Field by field
Anker
Belkin
Total output
100 W
140 W
Ports
2×C + 1×A
3×C + 1×A
Volume
smaller is better
120 cm³
185 cm³
Weight
smaller is better
not published
not published
Power density
0.83 W/cm³
0.76 W/cm³
PPS
Yes
Yes
EPR
over 100 W
No
Yes
Folding plug
No
No
Price per watt
net of VAT
0.29 €/W
no price
Documentation
8.5/10
7.5/10

marks the better value in that row. Ties, missing data and class differences get no mark.

Offers
EUR · incl. 19% VAT
€34.99
Geizhals
See at retailer
No DE offer
Anker 736 Charger (Nano II 100W) vs Belkin BoostCharge Pro 140W 4-Port GaN Wall Charger (PD 3.1) — size, per-port power and price · wattaire