wattaire
Anker
140W
CCCA
Charger (140W, 4-Port, PD 3.1)
Anker · A2697
vs
Apple
96W
C
96W USB-C Power Adapter
Apple · A2166
The short version
Apple does not publish how it divides power between ports, so a like-for-like comparison stops there.
Size, true to scale
front and side, one scale
20
40
60
size not published
69×69×36 mm
172 cm³ · 275 g
not published
— · weight not published

Solid block is the face you see in the socket; the outline next to it is depth.

Power by situation
bars share one scale · 140 W
One device, best port
140 W
96 W
What a laptop gets when nothing else is plugged in.
Two devices at once
70 + 70 W
not published
The best published pair, which is rarely an even split.
Three devices at once
not published
not enough ports
Everything plugged in together.

Port layouts differ, so we compare what you would do with the charger, not port pairs. Each row takes the best published combination for that situation.

Field by field
Anker
Apple
Total output
140 W
96 W
Ports
3×C + 1×A
1×C
Volume
smaller is better
172 cm³
not published
Weight
smaller is better
275 g
not published
Power density
0.81 W/cm³
—
PPS
Yes
No
EPR
over 100 W
Yes
No
Folding plug
Yes
No
Price per watt
net of VAT
0.45 €/W
no price
Documentation
7.8/10
7.0/10

marks the better value in that row. Ties, missing data and class differences get no mark.

Offers
EUR · incl. 19% VAT
€63.00
Anker EU Store · EU
See at retailer
No DE offer
Anker Charger (140W, 4-Port, PD 3.1) vs Apple 96W USB-C Power Adapter — size, per-port power and price · wattaire